Where are the peace-loving Muslims?
By DIANA WEST
When President George W. Bush says "Islam is peace" and British Prime Minister Tony Blair insists the war now begun "has nothing to do with Islam," some of us scratch our heads and try, brows furrowed, to reconcile their soothing words with our frightening vision: the dirty war on Western civilization waged by evil forces in the name of Islam.
The experts tell us militant Islamic fundamentalists, or "Islamists," represent a narrow, if murderous, fringe. They number no more than 10, maybe 15 percent of all Muslims. That estimate works out to somewhere between 100 million and 150 million people. Which is a lot of murderous fringe.
...
In Cairo, the paper reported, Friday prayers at the famous Al Azhar University mosque ended with a rousing chant of "America is the enemy of Arabs and Muslims. Let us die in our war against America." In New Delhi’s largest mosque, the imam urged "moral" support for Taliban jihad. In Nairobi, services progressed from attacking the United States to the parable "Every Muslim is Osama bin Laden."
Every Muslim, of course, is not Osama bin Laden. But why don’t more Muslims say so, quite loudly and very specifically? Muslim condolences after Sept. 11, 2001, very often came across as rather generic expressions of sympathy, equally as suitable for a natural disaster as for a terrorist act of war committed by co-religionists. Little sense of the magnitude of events is being communicated, and, thus, little recognition of the urgent need for civilized people of all faiths and nations to denounce this evil, vociferously and by name, and array themselves in warring solidarity against it.
What accounts for this weakness? And what is a reflexively tolerant, post-multicultural Westerner to make of it? Our dauntless leaders might repeat that the Islamist threat has nothing do with Islam, but, frankly, their mantra is getting a little ridiculous. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Amir Taheri, an Iranian author and journalist, recently declared that "to claim the attacks had nothing to do with Islam amounts to a whitewash." It’s also, he wrote, a "disservice to Muslims, who need to cast a critical glance at the way their faith is taught, lived and practiced."
Taheri, frank as he was, did not offer how-to specifics. But with reporters mining Islam for information previously limited to specialists, it’s clear how important this call for Islamic reform really is.
...
The New York Times quoted a lesson regarding whom "good Muslims" should befriend. "After examining a number of scriptures which warn of the dangers of having Christian and Jewish friends, the lesson concludes: ‘It is compulsory for the Muslims to be loyal to each other and to consider infidels their enemy.’ "
This comes straight from the Quran. "O believers," the Quran says (Sura 5, Verse 50), "do not hold Jews and Christians as your allies. They are the allies of one another; and anyone who makes them his friends is surely one of them."
As historian Paul Johnson noted in National Review, such "canonical commands" - along with "slay the idolaters wheresoever you find them" (Sura 9, Verse 5) - "cannot be explained away or softened by modern theological exegesis because there is no such science in Islam."
Johnson goes on to say that contrary to the evolving nature of both Christianity and Judaism, Islam has never undergone any update, reformation or enlightenment since its inception in the seventh century. "Islam," he wrote, "remains a religion of the Dark Ages. The seventh-century Quran is still taught as the immutable word of God, any teaching of which is literally true. In other words, mainstream Islam is essentially akin to the most extreme form of Biblical fundamentalism."
This stagnation is a key to the problem. The solution, however, is beyond the grasp of non-Muslims. This most critical, internal challenge falls to those Muslims around the world who desire to live and worship in peace.
Pertinent Links:
1) Where are the peace-loving Muslims?
Monday, October 16, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Which African nation is predominantly muslim, stable, has a government democratically elected in free and fair elections, has a functioning parliament, an unarmed police force, has demobilised the milita, is repatriating refugees, has a free press, a relatively stable exchange rate and, after years of war, has cleared itself of mines and successfully rebuilt it's infrastructure including modern airports, universities, power plants and hospitals - all by itself?
And it has achieved all this even though not recognised as a de facto state - and therefore does not qualify for bilateral aid or support from financial institutions.
The answer - Somaliland.
It is strategically important having a large coastline at the entrance to the Red Sea and is right next door to Somalia. Perhaps more importantly, it WANTS to be an ally of the US - but the US will not recognise it.
If we really want to see muslim nations develop along moderate democratic lines then we must recognise Somlaliland as a nation in it's own right - especially with neighbouring Somalia now in the hands of the Islamofascists.
This is a crucial time for Somaliland. There are signs that internal Islamists have been emboldened by the rise of the Islamic courts in Somalia. Support from the west in general and the US in particular could help this nation ensure that it's future remains secure and will continue to improve.
It's not a perfect state - is there such a thing? - and there is, no doubt, corruption and abuses of human rights as one may expect from a developing nation. But it is moving in the right direction - which is more than can be said for many African nations.
Recognition for Somaliland will come quicker if more of us publicise the situation and add prssure on our governments to recognise it. If you could add your voice to these calls for recognition it will help enormously.
Post a Comment