Islamic terrorists continue attacks on West, its values
By Victor Davis Hanson
Do we still need to fight a war on terror?
The answer seems to be "no" for an increasing number in the West who are weary over Afghanistan and Iraq or complacent from the absence of a major attack on the scale of Sept. 11.
The British Foreign Office has scrapped the phrase "war on terror" as inexact, inflammatory and counterproductive. U.S. Central Command has just dropped the term "long war" to describe the fight against radical Islam.
An influential book making the rounds - "Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them" - argues that the threat from Al-Qaida is vastly exaggerated.
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security adviser, goes further, assuring us that we are terrorized mostly by the false idea of a war on terror - not the jihadists themselves.
Even onetime neo-conservative Francis Fukuyama, who in 1998 called for the pre-emptive removal of Saddam Hussein, believes "war" is the "wrong metaphor" for our struggle against the terrorists.
Others point out that motley Islamic terrorists lack the resources of the Nazi Wehrmacht or the Soviet Union.
This thinking may seem understandable given the inability of Al-Qaida to kill many Americans after Sept. 11. Or it may also reflect hopes that if we only leave Iraq, radical Islam will wither away. But it is dead wrong for a number of reasons.
...
Read the rest...As always V.D.H. is da man...
Pertinent Links:
1) Islamic Terrorists Continue Attacks on West, Its Values
2) Victor Davis Hanson
Friday, April 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Biby Cletus said...
Nice post, its a really cool blog that you have here, keep up the good work, will be back.
Thank you Biby, I am trying to create something worthwile & useful to others.
A.I.
Post a Comment