Dangerous time for Middle East
By Patrick Seale, Special to Gulf News
All the ingredients are coming together for a new war in the Middle East. War-fever is being whipped up against Iran by an ignorant and bullying American president and by Israeli hawks shamelessly exploiting the paranoia lying never far beneath the surface of Israeli opinion.
President George W. Bush appears to fear, or has been persuaded by his neo-conservative advisers, that Iran poses a serious challenge to American hegemony in the strategic Gulf region, while Israeli propagandists equate Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with Hitler and portray his nuclear programme as an "existential" threat to the Jewish state - nothing less than a new holocaust in the making!
The message coming loud and clear from Washington and Tel Aviv is that Iranian ambitions must be stopped, whatever the cost. As American carrier strike forces converge on the Gulf, and as Israeli bombers practise long-range missions, several observers predict an attack on Iran in the early spring.
The outdated and dangerously mistaken security doctrine which underpins this war hysteria is that the United States and its Israeli ally must maintain their military supremacy in the region or risk imminent catastrophe.
Those who preach reconciliation with local forces based on mutual recognition of legitimate interests, on good neighbourliness and an equitable balance of power are dismissed as appeasers and defeatists.
The US and Israel seem determined to ignore the lessons of the wars they have waged, and lost, in Iraq, Lebanon and the Palestinian territories - namely that occupation breeds insurrection; that blatant aggression and injustice create terrorists; that an elusive "guerrilla" enemy is difficult to subdue; that states faced with the danger of war will seek deterrence; and that the merger of nationalism and Islam can forge ferocious militancy.
The locals, in sum, are not about to roll over and surrender.
Washington should perhaps reflect that China had no need for military bases in the Gulf to strike its recent historic $100 billion deal with Iran to secure long-term supplies of oil and gas, nor did Beijing rely on gunboat diplomacy to increase its bilateral trade with Saudi Arabia by 30 per cent between 2005 and 2006 alone. (Financial Times, January 30)
There are, however, one or two positive signs in the surrounding gloom. Under Democratic leadership, the US Congress is beginning to wake up and is attempting to curb Bush's belligerence by denying him funds for a deeper involvement in Iraq and insisting that he cannot wage war on Iran without explicit Congressional authority.
In turn, the American public is at last rebelling against the disastrous Iraq war, as may be seen from last week's massive anti-war demonstration in Washington.
More important still is the increasingly open discussion in the United States of the noxious influence of the Jewish lobby on America's foreign policy. In spite of scurrilous attacks by right-wing Jews, former president Jimmy Carter's brave indictment of Israeli policies, Palestine: Peace not Apartheid, is climbing up the best-seller lists.
Braving American and Israeli objections, the normally timid and divided European Union is calling for an urgent re-launch of the moribund Arab-Israeli peace process.
European states are also showing great reluctance to follow America's lead in boycotting Iranian banks, as demanded by Stuart Levey, US treasury undersecretary for terrorism and intelligence financing.
Positive signs are also emerging from the region itself, suggesting a will by local powers to solve problems without foreign interference. King Abdullah Bin Abdul Aziz of Saudi Arabia has indicated that he will not be dragooned by the United States into a confrontation with Iran.
Instead, high-level Saudi and Iranian envoys - Prince Bandar Bin Sultan and Ali Larijani, the heads of their respective national security councils - have held long talks in each other's capitals.
Saudi diplomacy has been active on other fronts. The King has summoned rival Palestinian factions - Fatah and Hamas - to Makkah for talks, and there are rumours that the Kingdom is planning to invite Lebanon's warring factions to a summit at Taif, the venue in 1989 of the last attempt to reach an agreement on Lebanese power-sharing.
Defusing tensions between Sunnis and Shiites, inflamed by America's war in Iraq, is high on the agenda of every regional leader.
Hezbollah's chief, Hassan Nasrallah, and Lebanon's Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, have both spoken of the need to resolve difference through dialogue not violence.
...
Read the whole thing...
You want to know a little about the author?!?
Patrick Seale is a British writer and consultant on Middle East affairs. His books include Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East (California) and Abu Nidal: A Gun for Hire (Random House).
Pertinent Links:
1) Dangerous time for Middle East
Thursday, February 01, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment