Sunday, January 28, 2007

DAR AL HARB - U.S.A.: TAKING MOSLEMS AT THEIR WORD

Taking Muslims at their word
By Scott P. Richert
Special to the Register Star

On Sept. 12, Pope Benedict XVI delivered his now-infamous Regensburg Address. The reaction in the Muslim world included protests, violence and the murder of a nun — all over the pope’s citation of a late-14th-century Byzantine emperor’s rhetorical claim that all that Muhammad brought that was new were “things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.”

Lost in the uproar was the main point of the pope’s speech: that “not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God’s nature” as Christians understand it. In Islam, however, Allah’s “will is not bound up with any of our (Western) categories, even that of rationality.”

Benedict’s speech was a call for dialogue between Christianity and Islam. For a dialogue to take place, however, three conditions are necessary: Both sides must be interested in pursuing the truth, which means embracing reason; both sides must represent their own positions truthfully, without any intent to deceive; and each side must take the other’s claims at face value, as truly representing the other’s position.

In the wake of Derrick Shareef's arrest for planning to detonate grenades at CherryVale Mall during Advent, a daylong dialogue that Aaron Wolf, the associate editor of Chronicles, and I held with leaders from the Iqra School and Muslim Association of Greater Rockford in February 2002 is perhaps more relevant today than it was when I published an account of it in the April 2002 issue of Chronicles.

(The text of the article is available at www.chroniclesmagazine.org/Chronicles/April2002/0402Rockford.htm.)

MAGR estimates that there are 300 Muslim families in the Rockford area; the school continues to grow, and may expand to include all 12 grades; and local Muslims are becoming more prominent, as doctors, lawyers and engineers, among other occupations.

What made the dialogue interesting was the candor with which both sides addressed questions about the role of Islam raised by the Sept. 11 attacks. When Aaron raised the question of the media's use of the term "radical Islam," Atteya Elnoory, the principal at that time, stated that "We don't even deal with radical Islam, because we do not know what it is." Dr. Khalid Siddiqui, then assistant director of the neonatal intensive-care unit at SwedishAmerican Hospital, the chairman of the board of the school, and now president of MAGR, elaborated on Elnoory’s remark, describing Islam as a pendulum, which can "swing to the extremes and come back to the middle, but you are still within the boundaries" of Islam.

Any discussion of radical Islam, he claimed, also depends on your perspective: "You can believe someone is a terrorist, and I don't." To prove his point, he cited the example of Osama bin Laden, who recognized the dangers of atheistic communism and "went (to Afghanistan) and used his whole wealth to fight."

When, as Dr. Siddiqui put it, bin Laden was able to do what the United States could not and the Russians were forced to withdraw from Afghanistan, "the CIA interfered and created a very unstable government." Finding themselves "still oppressed by Israel ... the only way to get out is to fight. Experience says that."

As for the future of Islam in America, Dr. Siddiqui argued that non-Muslim Americans should not fear the coming of sharia (Islamic law). "Who is superior to us? Only God. If he made the laws, then he can be unbiased." Moreover, he claimed, "If you look at the Constitution, it is a pure Islamic constitution," restricting the power of men and leaving room for the imposition of sharia.

Shpendim Nadzaku, the imam at the Rockford mosque (who hadn't yet moved to Rockford when Aaron and I visited), was called upon by the local media to condemn Shareef, and he held an open house at the mosque in the days after the arrest. The local media have presented him — correctly — as a representative of mainstream Islam. What they have not done, however, is attempt to understand what mainstream Islam means in an American context. As Dr. Siddiqui's remarks indicate, the views of mainstream Muslims are far from the views of most non-Muslim Americans. How many non-Muslims in Rockford believe that the Constitution is a pure Islamic document, and that America would benefit from adopting sharia as the law of the land? How many non-Muslims believe that the definition of terrorism should be different for Muslims than for non-Muslims?

In her Dec. 20 article on Sheik Nadzaku's open house, Geri Nikolai quoted Nadzaku as saying, "As long as justice is prevalent throughout society, at the end of the day, nothing should cause us to want to slaughter each other." On the surface, that seems a sentiment with which we can all agree. In Islam, as in the American constitutional system, justice means equal treatment before the law. For Muslims, however, the law in question is not the Constitution but sharia.

In his 1996 book "Salt of the Earth," Pope Benedict XVI (then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger) wrote that:

"The Quran is a total religious law, which regulates the whole of political and social life and insists that the whole order of life be Islamic."

"Sharia shapes society from beginning to end. In this sense, it can exploit such freedoms as our constitutions give, but it cannot be its final goal to say: Yes, now we too are a body with rights, now we are present (in society) just like the Catholics and the Protestants. In such a situation, (Islam) would not achieve a status consistent with its inner nature; it would be in alienation from itself."

Pope Benedict's understanding of this question is supported by prominent mainstream Muslims. The Rockford mosque has hosted a speaker from the Midwest chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the chief mainstream Muslim political activist group in the United States. A former chairman of CAIR, Silicon Valley entrepreneur Omar H. Ahmad, told the San Ramon Valley Herald in 1998 that:

"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Quran, the Muslim book of Scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth."

CAIR, on its Web site, declares that jihad, in addition to meaning "struggle against evil inclinations within oneself," includes "struggle in the battlefield for self-defense (e.g., having a standing army for national defense), or fighting against tyranny or oppression." And Muslim scholars, such as Syed Abul Hasan Ali Nadwi, in "Muslims in the West: The Message and Mission," declare that oppression and injustice prevail whenever a society prevents Muslims (and all men) from living under Islam.

After Chronicles published my account of our visit to the Iqra School, I went on Wisconsin Public Radio to discuss the article. An angry caller accused me of misrepresenting Islam. "You said that they want to impose sharia in the United States. That's not true." When I pointed out that the remark that upset her was not mine but a quotation from Dr. Siddiqui, the caller indignantly replied, "He may have said that, but he doesn't mean it."

Pope Benedict is right: The West must engage Islam. The Muslim belief that Allah is beyond all reason is indeed a stumbling block to dialogue, but an even greater one is the condescending refusal of non-Muslims to acknowledge that faithful Muslims in America really do believe what Islam teaches.


Pertinent Links:

1) Taking Muslims at their word

2) Through a Glass, Darkly

Moslem rap:

Give me, ya-Allah, Give me Iman and victory.
Give me, ya-Allah, give me strength to set us free,
As we struggle on your path,Mujahideen
Grant us, ya-Allah, the eyes to
see your light,
And show us, ya-Allah, what is wrong and what is right
As we walk along your path, Siratul Mustaqeem . . .

The word mujahideen is jarring, especially coming out of the mouths of nine- and ten-year-old children. Zaid translates it as "people who struggle in the way of Allah," giving it a spiritual twist that initially seems appropriate, since Iman means "faith" and Siratul Mustaqeem is "the straight path" or "the path of righteousness." The next verse, however, calls to mind a more common definition:

Help us, ya-Allah, to spread this blessed deen
And help us, ya-Allah, help the Muslimeen
And help us, ya-Allah, overcome the Mushrikeen . . .
Make us, ya-Allah, fighters for your deen,
And make us, ya-Allah for ever Mumineen
And do this, ya-Allah, despite the kafireen . . .

According to the glossary of Islamic terms compiled by the International Islamic University, deen is "Usually translated as 'religion', but in fact mean[s] 'life-transaction', the transaction being between Allah and each of his created beings. The life-transaction . . . is universal. It is the way of Islam . . . "

The Muslimeen and Mumineen are Muslims, while the Mushrikeen are, literally, "idol worshippers"; in common usage, however, the latter term means "People who associate partners with Allah Ta'ala, such as the Christians, who have raised the Prophet Isa (Jesus, Son of Mary) . . . to the level of Allah." Kafireen (or kuffar) means "unbelievers."

The song comes from a tape entitled The Next Level, produced by the Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA), "an organization dedicated to promoting Islamic awareness in Muslim youth." The lyrics to their songs can be found on their website, and the tapes are available in Muslim bookstores across the United States. The second song on The Next Level is "Jihad of the Nafs," an anglicization of Jihad an-Nafs, which the Islamic glossary defines as "fighting against one's own evil wants and trying one's utmost to be a better person in the sight of Allah." But the lyrics, presented in the style and idiom of gangsta rap, leave a different impression:


This is my Jihad, Jihad of the Nafs,
Battle of the soul against Shaytan and the rest.
I got my uzi of Iman,
bazooka of Qur'an
My M-16 of my deen of Islam,
Dropping bombs on Shaytan with Islam as my main gun,
He telling me to do wrong, I say "ain't gonna have noneof that."
Grenades, yo, of Taqwa on my back,
Bayonet of regret, if I ever get trapped.
I got the Sunna of the Prophet as my fully automatic.
I've been beaten by the devil many times and I've had it. . . .
Shaytan and his friends they be actin' diabolical
Yah, they be slick in the way they be calling us.
TV, CD, even on the PC,
Shaytan and his friends, yo, they keep us busy easy
Crazy, if you think you'll win without a plan
But Allah has a plan and this plan is Islam
Hey yo, Shaytan, yo I know that you're slick,
But Islam is the bomb, and now I got some tricks . . .

...

2 comments:

Winter Patriot said...

Derrick Shareef?

A guy with no car, no cash, no confederates, and no clue; who falls under the influence of somebody working for the FBI, who drives him around, talks to him about "jihad", gets him riled up and pushes him to say and do all kinds of things Shareef would never have thought of all by himself, including using grenades, including detonating them at CherryVale...

If you read the affidavit you can see that it's a setup -- a sting -- and you can see the FBI stinger leading him every step of the way.

The case has been discussed extensively on my blog, and to be honest it fits the profile of entrapment much better than it fits the profile of real terror.

I find that unfortunate, and even more unfortunately in my opinion cases like this are popping up all over the country.

I want to make two points related to Derrick Shareef and your post.

[1] If Derrick Shareef represents the worst of homegrown Islam, then we are not in such bad shape after all.

[2] Is this really the best way to combat terrorism? I don't think so. I'd rather see the FBI going after real bad-guys rather than hanging around mosques looking for gullible young fools to feed into their entrapment operation.

Please don't read my blog.

American Infidel said...

winter patriot

Out of the entire post you pick out one name and one name only, while completely ignoring the bigger picture...

Interesting, are you too afraid of the implications or do you think that there really is no problem?!?