EARTH: "DIALOGUE" BETWEEN THE WEST, IRAN & SYRIA ARE AT A DEAD END

Dialogue between the West, Iran and Syria leads to a dead end
The US has merely ended up eliminating Iran's two regional rivals -- the Taliban and Saddam Hussein's regime -- leaving it to project itself as a regional hegemon
By Ammar Abdulhamid
Saturday, Dec 23, 2006, Page 9

Despite frequent claims to the contrary, the fundamental problem in the Middle East is not intervention by the West. The real problem is that, for all their dabbling, the Western powers seem capable of neither war nor dialogue. This leaves everyone in the region at the mercy of the Middle East's oppressive regimes and proliferating terrorists.

Advocates of the Iraq war lacked an understanding of the complexities on the ground to wage an effective war of liberation and democratization. As a result, their policies merely ended up eliminating Iran's two major regional rivals: the Taliban and Saddam Hussein's regime. This presented Iran with a golden opportunity to project itself as a regional hegemon, and Iran's leaders are unlikely to let this opportunity slip away.

Advocates of dialogue with the Iranians and their Syrian allies, like former US Secretary of State James Baker, labor under the delusion that they can actually reach an understanding that can enable a graceful US exit from Iraq and help stabilize that wounded country. The delusion is based on two false assumptions -- that the Iranians and the Syrians can succeed in Iraq where the US has failed, and that the international community can afford to pay the price of ensuring their cooperation.

...

Pertinent Links:

1) Dialogue between the West, Iran and Syria leads to a dead end